Here is part five (of five) posts about my attempt to get financial help from the company that manufactured the rabies vaccine Lilly received January 23, 2012. Today, please take our dog blog poll. Would you have taken the money?
At long last, I give you part four (of five) posts that tell the story of our quest to get financial help from the company that manufactured the rabies vaccine Lilly received January 23, 2012. Following several days of being as factual, unemotional, and undramatic as possible – considering the circumstances – allow me, won’t you, to rant?
And, now, here is part three (of five) posts about my attempt to get financial help from the company that manufactured the rabies vaccine Lilly received January 23, 2012. Today, here are details on why I turned down the adverse vaccine reaction financial settlement.
This post is part two (of five) that address my quest to get financial help from the company that manufactured the rabies vaccine Lilly received January 23, 2012. Today’s post covers details on the two legal release clauses that gave me pause.
Here is part one (of five) posts that tell the story of our quest to get financial help from the company that manufactured the rabies vaccine Lilly received January 23, 2012. Today, we cover the timeline and process from my initial request to the official adverse vaccine reaction financial settlement offer.
